Sam Bankman-Fried Denies Knowing FTX Money Was Missing, as He Concludes Testimony

Above and above on Tuesday, Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the failed FTX cryptocurrency exchange, denied knowing that billions of dollars in buyer cash experienced been misappropriated until finally soon prior to his company collapsed past calendar year, as a federal prosecutor grilled him for a 2nd working day in his prison fraud trial.

The 31-yr-aged onetime crypto mogul fumbled for an remedy when the prosecutor, Danielle Sassoon, regularly requested no matter whether he experienced told his staff not to devote FTX buyer money on investments, dear true estate and other expenses. Mr. Bankman-Fried also couldn’t name any personnel who may well have licensed the use of FTX customer cash for that expending.

“I never recall supplying any course,” Mr. Bankman-Fried explained 3 periods about the investing of FTX buyer funds in advance of he concluded his testimony. Each sides rested their circumstance before lunchtime on Tuesday, with closing statements established to unfold on Wednesday.

Mr. Bankman-Fried was on the stand for a third day testifying ahead of a jury in his own defense for a demo that has occur to symbolize the highs and lows of the unstable crypto field. The entrepreneur has been accused of masterminding a yearslong fraud to steal as a lot as $10 billion from FTX’s clients and then funneling the dollars to extravagant serious estate buys and other investing, as perfectly as employing the money to prop up a crypto investing business he also started, Alameda Study.

FTX, which was valued at $32 billion at its peak, imploded spectacularly past yr, leaving many customers not able to recuperate their deposits. Mr. Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to 7 counts of fraud, conspiracy and dollars laundering. If convicted, he could encounter what amounts to a lifestyle sentence.

The very first couple of weeks of his demo have been filled by a procession of prosecution witnesses who pointed the finger squarely at Mr. Bankman-Fried and mentioned he had directed them to commit crimes. A few of his closest associates — Caroline Ellison, Nishad Singh and Gary Wang — have pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.

The pileup of detrimental testimony could have pressured the FTX founder’s hand in testifying, a dangerous move for a prison defendant. Having the stand gave Mr. Bankman-Fried an option to say that he by no means intended to defraud everyone and that his small business conclusions had been produced in fantastic religion. But it also allowed prosecutors to zero in on his earlier community statements and contrast them with what he did in personal.

When Mr. Bankman-Fried to begin with took the stand on Friday, he took concerns from his personal lawyer, Mark Cohen. Mr. Bankman-Fried denied that he had committed fraud or stolen from FTX’s consumers, but also acknowledged that he experienced manufactured errors, citing “significant oversights” that damage the exchange’s buyers.

On Monday under cross-assessment, Ms. Sassoon, the prosecutor, pressed Mr. Bankman-Fried about the inconsistencies in between his community statements and how he ran his crypto empire. He usually insisted that he couldn’t remember substantially of what he had claimed publicly.

On Tuesday, the cross-assessment ongoing, concentrating on the steps and statements Mr. Bankman-Fried built primary up to the implosion of FTX in November. Mr. Bankman-Fried, putting on the identical grey fit and purple tie as in former times on the stand, testified in entrance of a crowded courtroom that integrated Damian Williams, the leading federal prosecutor in New York. Missing from the gallery was Mr. Bankman-Fried’s mom, the Stanford law professor Barbara Fried, who experienced attended each individual preceding working day of the demo.

Ms. Sassoon, the federal prosecutor, was relentless, inquiring Mr. Bankman-Fried about the failure of FTX, together with if some of the cooperating witnesses had not advised the fact about Alameda, the trading organization, owing billions in customer dollars to the trade. Mr. Bankman-Fried beforehand testified that he did not study about the lacking cash until finally about Oct 2022, even though other witnesses testified that he knew significantly before.

At a single place, Ms. Sassoon requested Mr. Bankman-Fried if Adam Yedidia, a previous FTX developer who testified at the trial, was lying when he claimed in courtroom that Mr. Bankman-Fried had advised him in the summer time of 2022 that Alameda owed $8 billion to FTX buyers.

“I don’t try to remember him expressing it in that way,” Mr. Bankman-Fried replied.

Ms. Sassoon then requested if Ms. Ellison, who ran Alameda and was at a single point Mr. Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend, was erroneous when she testified that she and Mr. Bankman Fried experienced conspired with some others to misappropriate FTX purchaser income.

“You did not explain to your employees, ‘Don’t shell out FTX shopper deposits’?” Ms. Sassoon questioned at a person issue.

“I did not,” Mr. Bankman-Fried explained. “I deeply regret not getting a far better appear into it.”

Ms. Sassoon also asked Mr. Bankman-Fried if he remembered featuring favors to govt officials in the Bahamas, in which FTX was centered. He stated he did not recall giving the Bahamian key minister, Philip Davis, and his spouse courtside tickets to the FTX Arena in Miami. The jury was then proven screenshots of messages of him saying just that. (The arena has been renamed.)

The prosecution also exhibited email messages in which Mr. Bankman-Fried presented to open up withdrawals for Bahamian prospects right after FTX experienced halted purchaser withdrawals as individuals experimented with to get their dollars out from the trade final yr. FTX was less than investigation by Bahamian regulators at the time.

In the course of a transient redirect, Mr. Bankman-Fried experimented with to make clear that he did not know who at Alameda had licensed the investing of FTX customer funds. FTX had about two dozen staff members, he mentioned, and “I was not particularly intrigued in striving to dole out blame.”

Soon after closing statements on Wednesday, jurors could begin deliberating a verdict for the situation as soon as Thursday.